Empirical methods to reduce uncertainty about solar geoengineering
David Keith, Frank Keutsch, and Cody Floerchinger
David Keith, Frank Keutsch, and Cody Floerchinger
It’s possible that the deliberate alteration in the Earth’s radiative balance—solar geoengineering—can offer a significant reduction in climate risks when compared to a world with the same emissions trajectory but without geoengineering. Current estimates of the ability of large-scale geoengineering to reduce risks (its efficacy) or the extent to which it introduces new risks (its risks) are almost entirely based on numerical experiments with large-scale models. While it will never be possible
to fully determine the efficacy and risks, the combination of models and experiments—both laboratory
and outdoors—offers the best pathway to reduce uncertainties.
Stardust is tackling the wrong problem with the wrong structure
MIT Technology Review: Why the For-Profit Race into Solar Geoengineering is Bad for Science and Public Trust
Preserving Earth’s Reflectivity: Supplementary Comments on “A Responsible Way to Cool the Planet”